Skip to main content

Shame and the Fragile Construction of Singer Identity


Being a singer often begins with a spark—a moment when someone notices your talent, when you’re told you have a “gift.” From there, a singer identity starts to take shape. But this identity isn’t formed in isolation. It is crafted through relationships with teachers, peers, institutions, audiences—and through the unspoken rules about what counts as "good," "worthy," or "successful."

This construction of identity can be exhilarating and affirming. But it is also fragile—because it often hinges on acceptance or rejection from others. That’s where shame begins to creep in.

Through reading countless articles and books on this subject I came to recognise my own vocal shame which crept up on me over time and culminated in the painful aftermath of vocal injury and a failed operation. For years, I had worked on my craft and career—not just because I loved singing, but because my identity felt contingent on it. I didn't quite see that my voice and "singer identity" had become central to my worth. When it faltered, I faltered. I felt exposed, anxious, and deeply ashamed. I didn’t just mourn the technical losses—I questioned my right to sing at all. That shame was expressed through my silence.

This experience illuminated the fragile scaffolding on how I "defined" myself, the contingencies on how  my singer identity had been built, entangled not only with performance or teaching pressure, but also with deeply internalised beliefs about worth, belonging, and identity itself.

As a professional singer and teacher, I’ve noticed (and personally experienced) the many ways singers come to define and construct themselves and whilst this list is by no means exhaustive, it provides some food for thought. So, here are some key identity-building forces I’ve observed and experienced:

  • Natural Talent: Being “born to sing” can feel empowering, but it can also be excluding. When your voice changes, or when talent alone isn’t enough, the identity built on this begins to shake.

  • Skill Acquisition: Training with respected teachers and institutions often shapes a singer’s self-worth. But it can create a deep dependence on external approval, where a singer feels valid only when praised.

  • Uniqueness and Originality: Finding “your sound” is often encouraged. But sometimes, that pressure to be different can feel forced or disconnected from authenticity.

  • Influences and Taste: Our sound is shaped by everything we’ve heard and loved—social, cultural, ethnic, familial. But dominant singing cultures don’t always value this diversity.

  • Group Identity: Belonging to a genre or scene can give us a sense of community. But it can also require a kind of conformity that stifles individual expression.

Shame intersects with these identity-shaping forces in subtle, persistent ways such as:

  • Comparison and Competition: The voice of comparison whispers constantly—"Am I as good as them?"—and easily turns into "I’ll never be enough."

  • Genre Conformity: Shame emerges both when you don’t fit in and when you try to. Fitting the mould can feel just as painful as being left out of it.

  • Training and Shaming: Teacher-student dynamics can nurture growth—but they can also sow shame, especially when power is misused.

  • Elitism and Hierarchies: Some voices, styles, or backgrounds are deemed more legitimate than others. The rest of us are left wondering if we’re “real” enough.

  • Gender and Class: Navigating expectations around how a singer should look, sound, or speak adds another layer of shame—especially for women, gender-diverse singers, and those from working-class backgrounds.

Singers carry the weight of these intersecting pressures, often quietly.
When shame enters this mix, it can distort not just how we feel about our voice, but who we believe we are allowed to be. It’s about the silent beliefs and questionings  - are we too much, not enough, or acceptable? And what we do to assimilate and accomodate and relinquish parts of ourselves in order to cover up, hide or shy away - and all the while not knowing that we are doing it and the powers at play behind it - these things, I believe can be deeply rooted in how our singer identities are built.

By exploring the relationship between shame and identity, we begin to disentangle ourselves from the need for external permission to belong. We can start rebuilding a sense of self that is centred on voice, yes—but also on compassion.

Subscribe to the blog

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Perfectionism, Singing, and the Quiet Toll on Mental Health

Perfectionism is a term we hear often in the arts, and in some circles, it’s even worn like a badge of honour. Many singers—including myself—take pride in setting high standards, and tireless preparation. But what happens when that drive to be perfect starts driving us ? I’ve spent much of my professional life in and around singing—as a performer, teacher, and now as a researcher. One thing I’ve noticed again and again is just how many singers identify as perfectionists. We often see it as a bit of a quirk or strength: evidence of our commitment, work ethic, and respect for the craft. And yet, for many of us, perfectionism hasn’t been a source of freedom. It’s been a source of suffering. In psychological literature, perfectionism is increasingly understood not just as a trait, but as a process —a way of thinking, behaving, and relating to oneself that can deeply affect emotional wellbeing. Self-oriented perfectionism, in particular, is common among musicians. This is the kind where t...

The Singer Who Doesn’t Sing

There was a time when singing felt as natural as breathing. Not just something I did—but who I was. From my teenage years, singing wasn’t a skill—it was my identity. It was how I connected, how I expressed joy, how I made people feel good. It made me feel attractive, wanted, visible. Before I knew I could sing, I didn’t think I had much to offer. But when I sang, people responded. And that response began to shape my sense of self. For years, I lived and worked as a singer. It was in my friendships, my social life, my work, my spirit. I belonged to communities of musicians. I was on stage. I was in the room. I was in it . And then—quietly—I wasn’t. When my voice began to feel unstable, when I no longer trusted it, I did what so many do with something precious and painful: I hid it. I didn’t talk about it. I didn’t announce anything. I just moved countries. I told myself I was starting a new life—and I was. But underneath that move was a quieter truth: I was finding a way to step o...

When a Voice Becomes a Thing: Objectification in Singing

Establishing the Ground I’ve been dancing around this for a while—wondering whether to lay down a kind of philosophical welcome mat for anyone curious enough to follow my writing. Part of me hesitated (I do love to leap straight into the deep end), but I know I use certain terms— shame , objectification , embodiment —that deserve some unpacking. So this post is a beginning. Or rather, a bridge. Over the next few blogs, I’ll share some of the frameworks that have shaped my research and teaching. None of them are fixed. They’re evolving—much like the singers I work with, and like me, as I keep reading, listening, and learning. These concepts don’t belong to me. But I’ve been holding them up to the light, testing them against real experiences. They’ve helped me understand something about the inner lives of singers—the quiet pressures and unspoken hurts—and I think they might help others, too. This isn’t about airtight definitions. It’s about naming the waters we’re swimming in—so we ...